Although Pumas are great in FoW they were not as successful in WWII mainly because of they armament. It was really tempting to smash some light tanks and soft vehicles with the powerful 50L60 gun. This is for sure not the aim of recon vehicles...
The models I have in front of me were produced by Forged in Battle (FiB) and are casted in resin with some metal parts (P-77). I painted them in ultra-fast way because of the tournament we had last week (there is no better stimulus to paint minis than forthcoming tournament ;).
Blister contents
The blister contains three Pumas. They are produced in "battle-ready" system. It means that FiB tried to reduce the time required to assemble the models. The number of parts is reduced in comparison to Battlefront miniatures. The body is casted in resin and the turret is made from metal. The drawback is that the models are fixed to bases (removing it would be quite difficult, but I assume possible). At the beginning I perceived it as a huge cons, but after assembling and painting the models it turned out that it is only a minor issue. "Battle-ready" means also that the models are produced in different variants (e.g., they have battle damage, crates, cans, etc.) so you don't have to add additional element to customize them. It is quite similar to what could be found in Battlefront's box sets. In my blister there were two variants of vehicle. You also get two commanders figures, which are sculpted and casted perfectly.
Model size
Probably most of you would like to know how they compare to Battlefront's version of Puma. In my opinion the difference is quite visible. However, if you don't play a recon company and don't need to mix tons of Pumas, it will not matter so much. A FiB blister gives you what you actually need in most cases - 3 vehicles. If you put grass on a base it won't be visible so much after all. Taking into account prices you receive three vehicles in price of two from BF.
Thanks to Radek (a.k.a. Radziecki) who provided a BF Pumas, I can present you a size comparison of BF and FiB vehicles.
Battlefront vs. Forged in Battle Puma |
Gallery
Couple of photos of painted models:
thanks for that. I have the puma and haven't painted yet, but yours look very good and inspirational.
ReplyDeleteYou will have lots of good time painting them. Really nice minis :) - I'm waiting to see the results
DeleteVery nice painting. Thank you for the comparison.
ReplyDeletecheers
Thanks I'm glad you liked them :)
DeleteNice review. Putting the dimensions on the photo like you did was ambitious! I'd love to see them in a battle report one day.
ReplyDeleteI have reviewed a couple of models from Forged in Battle, including the Marder IIIM which I very much liked the detail on, and the Sd Kfz 251/1, which are almost perfectly in scale for 15mm.
Aside from coming on a base, which I believe is unavoidable when casting a full model like this in resin, I am impressed with FiB's stuff.
Thanks :)
DeleteI read your review of Marders some time ago. Very nice one. It's really tempting to grab them. If they had marders IIIH I wouldn't think twice.
Well technically it should be not that much of a problem. The most important point is cost in my opinion, you would have a more complex mold, that would add some cost, and you might have more models that might break when they are removed form the mold, models they cant sell, so the would waste time (=money) and material (=money).
DeleteAnd having a more complex scupt would take more time as well.
Personally i placed my fist order of FiB models during the last week and i'm quite interested how the will turn out. Got some more on my list... i'm sort of worried about the proportions, but if i need more Pumas and the model is good (as i would exspect after reading this) i would stick to them, the BF Puma looks wired somehow.
There is just something about the way you airbrush on the camo, it looks fantastic. Nice review and nice paintjob
ReplyDeleteThank you :)
DeleteI think it might because of filters it makes the airbrush camo "softer"